August 2, 57 Comments The debate around genetically modified organisms GMO is huge and heated on either side. One of the major considerations when arguing against the use of GMO products is the potential for environmental harm. What exactly are the environmental risks to consider in regards to GMOs? First of all, it is important to understand what a GMO is precisely.
Zion Lights October 31, Genetically modified foods have been a source of controversy amongst consumers and scientists since the technology was first developed in the s. Despite the ongoing debate regarding the environmental, animal, and human impacts of genetically modified foods, many Americans are already consuming more than their body weight in GM foods today.
The central problem with GM foods debate is that big business is involved in the debate. This means that it is difficult to get a clear view of the potential hazards connected with consuming GM foods, or to read between the arguments on both side of the discussion.
For the corporations producing GM foods, increasing sales means big money, whereas a poor public image of GM products means low sales. The large companies that seek to increase their profits from this area of business have much as stake when it comes to what the average consumer believes regarding GM foods, and this has led to the issues surrounding GM foods becoming muddied with politics.
A prime example of this is the ongoing criticism of a cosy relationship between food standards agencies and pro-GM corporations such as Monsanto. For examplein pro-GM lobbyist Michael R.
Taylor became a senior adviser to the Food and Drug Administration on food safety. Taylor later became a vice-president of Monsanto, and in he returned to government as Senior Advisor to the Commissioner of the FDA. The Animal Impact Another problem surrounding the production of GM foods is that it requires animal testing, which is not per cent reliable when it comes to predicting the impact of foods and medicines on humans.
These tests are also only conducted for a few months at a time, as regulators of GM foods currently only require day trials to take place, whereas human consumption of GM foods is constantly on the increase.
In addition to this are general concerns that GM technology treats animals as commodities akin to factory-farming culture. Advocates for animal rights and health enthusiasts cite Daisy the cow, who was genetically modified to manufacture a type of hypoallergenic milk, as an example of the increasing disconnection between food and the consumer, and between animal and man.
The results showed that GM crops had a significant negative impact on local wildlife, particularly bird populations.
tance of environmental and genetic inﬂuences on morphology, which may have important taxonomic and evolutionary implications, and may affect the conservation and management of wild-living and captive populations. A Research on the Environmental Issues on the Use of Plastic, GMOs, and Animal Captivity PAGES 9. WORDS 3, View Full Essay. More essays like this: Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University. Exactly what I needed. - Jenna Kraig, student @ UCLA. Wow. Most helpful essay resource ever! Today, however, people have become much more informed about the needs and behavior of wild animals and the toll that captivity takes on them. Most zoos do not begin to replicate the lush jungles, vast savannahs, and dense forests where animals belong.
The Human Impact Concerns about GM foods are often ridiculed because they are not based on evidence; however anti-GM consumers cite this as the very reason for their concern. There is no evidence to prove that GM foods are safe for long-term consumption by humans, and this will be the case until long-term trials to establish the effects of GM foods on humans over prolonged periods of time take place, as this is how the average global consumer will be ingesting them over time, and how many Americans already are.
Other concerns about the safety of consuming GM foods relate to the fact that little is known about how much people will consume them, how often and in what combinations.
Regulars admit that this makes it difficult to design a meaningful clinical study of the safety of GM foods for consumption.
Instead, regulators examine the genetic modification to check how similar it is to its non-GM-derived counterpart, which is not a thorough way of deducing the impacts that GM foods might have on the human body. Evidence that was released last week demonstrates the desperate need for thorough clinical trials of GM foods to take place before allowing their release into every corner of the global food market.
In light of these new findings, French health and safety authorities are planning to investigate NK, and the European Food Safety Agency has said it will assess the research. To Label or Not to Label? One way to overcome this issue of potential harm to human health could be to allow GM foods to infiltrate our groceries and supermarkets, but for clear labelling to distinguish them from non-GM foods.
If GM foods were clearly labelled, those in favour of the technology could prove to be ideal case studies in terms of the effect GM food consumption has on human health over a prolonged period of time.
Equally, it would give consumers the power to distinguish between GM and non-GM foods, which is only possible at present when organic options are available, as certified organic foods have to be from non-GM sources.
This consumer power is important especially for those with ethical concerns, due to the fact that all GM foods are tested on animals before they can be released for human consumption.
The European Union and at least 21 countries have introduced measures to ensure some form of labelling of GM foods, however various pro-GM bodies in the U. What Can You Do? Keep the debate going. Spread the world about the steady infiltration of GM foods into our food chain, which many Americans are unaware of.
Demand that more trials take place before people are made to consume GM foods. The pro-GM lobby is right that we have no proof that GM foods are harmful to human health, but we do know that there is no evidence to the contrary, and that they require thousands, if not millions, of animals to be harmed in the testing process.Aug 08, · New research into captive elephant lifespans reveals that wild-caught animals live shorter lives.
Elephants are critical to the logging industry across Southeast Asia, even though the animals are. GMOs clearly can be used to address important ethical and environmental problems in agriculture that are difficult to tackle by other means.
As the technology less expensive, more companies will design GMOs to solve these problems, especially small companies that aspire to achieve some social good. A Research on the Environmental Issues on the Use of Plastic, GMOs, and Animal Captivity PAGES 9.
WORDS 3, View Full Essay. More essays like this: Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University. Exactly what I needed. - Jenna Kraig, student @ UCLA.
Wow. Most helpful essay resource ever! Genetically modified organism - GMOs in medicine and research: GMOs have emerged as one of the mainstays of biomedical research since the s.
For example, GM animal models of human genetic diseases enabled researchers to test novel therapies and to explore the roles of candidate risk factors and modifiers of disease outcome. The use of GMOs in medicine and research has produced a debate that is more philosophical in nature.
and environmental issues, but they must be used wisely. Julia (disambiguation). GloFish, the first genetically modified animal to be sold as a pet A genetically modified organism (GMO) or genetically engineered organism (GEO) is an. tance of environmental and genetic inﬂuences on morphology, which may have important taxonomic and evolutionary implications, and may affect the conservation and management of wild-living and captive populations.