It involves a leader, a Senate and a war in the desert. Clearly a modern allegory. I've had the theory that the moral depiction of dragons in popular fantasy gives a decent rough indicator of the global financial situation. In a boom, you see, the hoarding of gold is more likely to be considered to be a harmless eccentricity, even something desirable, and dragons are noble and nice.
It is not, has never been, nor will ever be, a Wikipedia policy or guideline. Rather, it illustrates standards or conduct that are generally not accepted by the Wikipedia community.
Some discussions are born lame; some achieve lameness; some have lameness thrust upon them. Upon coming across a discussion that is borderline lame, some Wikipedians may be tempted to go do something useful.
This is a big mistake. Left to its own devices, the discussion might inadvertently become useful. It is essential that as many editors as possible chime in, not adding to the discussion at hand, but merely commenting how lame it is and what a big waste of time it is.
See Self-fulfilling prophecyPositive feedbackand Exponential growth. Merely stating the discussion is lame is frequently not sufficient; every opposing statement must be denied with increasingly vehement assertions of the lameness. While at first blush, wasting time whining about what a waste of time something is may seem illogical, the inherent irony just magnifies the lameness.
An additional step to increase lameness is to include repeated links to this essay, which is WP: The best way to set about a lame edit war is to change a large number of articles based on your interpretation of minutiae in the manual of style.
If this does not work, try changing the MOS itself; that always works. Guidelines on how to add an entry to this guide If you want to add a "lame edit war" to this page, keep the following in mind: It must have been an actual edit war.
Discussions on talk pages, even over trivially lame details, are not "edit wars" and should NEVER be added: Note that pithy quotes on talk pages may be suitable for Wikipedia: It should truly be amongst the lamest edit wars. Not just garden-variety lame.
Unless a participant is banned for their part in the edit war, do not give the names of participants or link to their userpages. Be careful to avoid even the semblance of taking sides in the war.
If you feel that an edit war was truly lame, add it! The lameness of it should speak for itself. Of course, editors with a more experienced eye for lameness may disagree with your claim to the "lamest," which may just result in yet another lame edit war!
Note that the no original research and verifiability policies are meant to apply to the article namespacenot necessarily on pages like this in the Wikipedia project namespace.
This is intended for the community rather than your average readers.Essay on Disney Goes to War: Animated Propaganda Words | 11 Pages. means of propaganda. Today it is impossible to imagine American animated cinema without Disney and its cartoons.
The American captivation with Disney has not changed much in the seventy years since World War II. This page contains material which is kept because it is considered humorous. Please do not take it too seriously. The Theory of Poll Manipulation in Taiwan (05/31/) (China Times) With respect to the case described in Comment #, Taipei county electoral district #2 has a population of about , households.
[ The story of the Tower of Babel is explained in Genesis 11 in just a few verses. The Babylonians wanted a tower that would "reach to the heavens" so that they could be like God and that they would not need benjaminpohle.com did not like the pride and arrogance in the hearts of the people.
Walt Disney helped the war efforts through propaganda. During the Second World War, Disney turned to aiding the United States government by producing motion pictures serving as both training videos and propaganda films for the US.
3 // Mary Silliman’s War – This film is based on the true story of Mary Silliman and her husband, General Gold Selleck Silliman of Fairfield, Connecticut as told in the biography, The Way of Duty, A Woman and Her Family in Revolutionary America by Joy Day Buel and Richard Buel.
This is a wrenching tale.