If Jesus Christ was not murdered and did not rise from the grave, then He is no different than any of the wise men or prophets of other religions. Some will argue that Jesus was never resurrected because He did not die on the cross. We have proved that Jesus not only suffered extreme pain, but died on the cross.
Christ alive … Robert Powell as Jesus of Nazareth in The historical evidence for Jesus of Nazareth is both long-established and Proof of jesus resurrection. Within a few decades of his supposed lifetime, he is mentioned by Jewish and Roman historians, as well as by dozens of Christian writings.
Compare that with, for example, King Arthur, who supposedly lived around AD The major historical source for events of that time does not even mention Arthur, and he is first referred to or years after he is supposed to have lived.
The evidence for Jesus is not limited to later folklore, as are accounts of Arthur. What do Christian writings tell us? The value of this evidence is that it is both early and detailed. These all appeared within the lifetimes of numerous eyewitnesses, and provide descriptions that comport with the culture and geography of first-century Palestine.
It is also difficult to imagine why Christian writers would invent such a thoroughly Jewish saviour figure in a time and place — under the aegis of the Roman empire — where there was strong suspicion of Judaism.
What did non-Christian authors say about Jesus? As far as we know, the first author outside the church to mention Jesus is the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, who wrote a history of Judaism around AD He has two references to Jesus.
About 20 years after Josephus we have the Roman politicians Pliny and Tacitus, who held some of the highest offices of state at the beginning of the second century AD. From Tacitus we learn that Jesus was executed while Pontius Pilate was the Roman prefect in charge of Judaea AD and Tiberius was emperor AD — reports that fit with the timeframe of the gospels.
Pliny contributes the information that, where he was governor in northern Turkey, Christians worshipped Christ as a god. Did ancient writers discuss the existence of Jesus? Strikingly, there was never any debate in the ancient world about whether Jesus of Nazareth was a historical figure.
In the earliest literature of the Jewish Rabbis, Jesus was denounced as the illegitimate child of Mary and a sorcerer. Among pagans, the satirist Lucian and philosopher Celsus dismissed Jesus as a scoundrel, but we know of no one in the ancient world who questioned whether Jesus lived.
How controversial is the existence of Jesus now? In a recent book, the French philosopher Michel Onfray talks of Jesus as a mere hypothesis, his existence as an idea rather than as a historical figure.
About 10 years ago, The Jesus Project was set up in the US; one of its main questions for discussion was that of whether or not Jesus existed. Some authors have even argued that Jesus of Nazareth was doubly non-existent, contending that both Jesus and Nazareth are Christian inventions.
It is worth noting, though, that the two mainstream historians who have written most against these hypersceptical arguments are atheists: Jesus was on the side of the poor and exploited. Christian politicians should remember that Brad Chilcott Read more Is there any archaeological evidence for Jesus?
Part of the popular confusion around the historicity of Jesus may be caused by peculiar archaeological arguments raised in relation to him. Recently there have been claims that Jesus was a great-grandson of Cleopatra, complete with ancient coins allegedly showing Jesus wearing his crown of thorns.
It is hard to find historians who regard this material as serious archaeological data, however. The documents produced by Christian, Jewish and Roman writers form the most significant evidence.Is there any historical evidence, outside of the scriptures, that verify Jesus was a real person who lived in the first century – and what he did?
There are, in fact, several.
What do . Q: How does the certainty of the resurrection help buoy the believer in difficult times? A: I think the evidence is important because it points us in the direction of Jesus being the Son of God, but if you ask me today why I believe, I don’t generally go back to the evidence, even though it’s there.
Proof of Jesus Christ? 7 Pieces of Evidence Debated. books to be proof of the real-life existence of Jesus, because one page displayed an . The historical evidence for the resurrection of Christ is very good.
Scholars such as William Lane Craig, J.P. Moreland, Gary Habermas, and others have done an especially good job of detailing that evidence. 1 It is the aim of this article to offer a sort of synthesis of some of their key points and. A scholar takes a close look at the claims for the historicity of Jesus' resurrection.
The Case for Christ: What’s the evidence for the resurrection? April 7, am EDT. The historical evidence for the resurrection of Christ is very good.
Scholars such as William Lane Craig, J.P. Moreland, Gary Habermas, and others have done an especially good job of detailing that evidence.1 It is the aim of this.